Future Super measures environmental impact of portfolioBY RACHEL ALEMBAKIS | FRIDAY, 26 JUN 2020 10:10AMFuture Super has released its second impact report, measuring the fund's environmental impact both in terms of fossil fuel investments avoided and renewable energy that investments have generated. |
Editor's Choice
Hearts & Minds,Third Link Growth Fund merge
|Hearts & Minds Investments and Third Link Growth Fund have announced a merger, with Hearts & Minds taking over the role of investment management of the fund.
ASFI launches physical risk inclusion in sustainable finance taxonomy
|The Australian Sustainable Finance Institute (ASFI) has launched a scoping project to expand Australian Sustainable Finance Taxonomy to climate change adaptation and resilience.
New Forests eyes forestry plantations
|New Forests is set to acquire the forestry plantations of Associated Kiln Driers (AKD) and Heywood Plantations, the approval of which currently sits before the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
Flexible work fails to follow women into leadership
While a greater number of women are advancing into management roles, inflexible leadership positions and unequal caring responsibilities are forcing more women to leave senior positions.
Further Reading




"According to recent research from Rainmaker Information ... if a superannuation fund member invested in general balanced or growth super fund options they would have been 1.5% better off over the 12-months to end March if they chose ESG balanced or growth options."
Is there a link to the research? Does this apply to Future Super's options or to some general ESG classification of investment components and therefore also to other super funds that offer ethical and sustainable social impact investment?
Hi Professor Davos,
The research is derived from Rainmaker Information, the parent company to this publication. It refers to a general balanced or growth super fund option compared to a general ESG balanced or growth option (not just Future Super).