Remuneration consultant disclosure regime questionedBY RACHEL ALEMBAKIS | WEDNESDAY, 18 DEC 2013 7:29AMThe rationale behind the requirement on listed companies to disclose information about remuneration consultants is "unclear" and the regime should either be discarded or improved to provide more specific information, according to a report by Ownership Matters. Related News |
Editor's Choice
Green moves: Aware Super, Minderoo Foundation
CareSuper hired an ESG specialist from a rival, while Andrew Forrest's Minderoo Foundation appointed an executive director of effective philanthropy.
Macquarie AM takes over Island Green Power
Macquarie Asset Management (MAM) is now the owner of renewable energy developer Island Green Power, scooping up the remaining 50% stake.
Palliser Capital hits out at Rio Tinto board
Palliser Capital has vowed to continue pressing for governance reform at Rio Tinto after its shareholder resolution calling for an independent review of the miner's dual-listed company structure fell short at the group's annual general meeting.
ISSB looks to ease Scope 3 disclosure requirements
The International Sustainability Standards Board has proposed changes to requirements under IFRS S2 to offer clarity around existing reliefs and provide further relief in relation to specific Greenhouse Gas emissions disclosures.
Whitepapers
Mandatory sustainability reporting in Australia
This paper provides an in-depth guide on identifying which entities need to prepare mandatory sustainability reports in their annual reports, and covers ...
Decoding Trump 2.0 and the impact on ESG investing
From an ESG perspective, Trump's social, economic and political agenda will keep issues rich and complicated for companies and investors alike, and that ...
Powering AI: An opportunity for investors?
Power availability is the biggest challenge for artificial intelligence (AI) growth.
