Editor's Choice
Green Moves: ACSI, PRI, HOPE Housing
PRI chief executive steps down, while ACSI strengthens its ESG team with a Greenfluence founder and HOPE Housing hires a director to raise capital.
Industry fund dumps sustainable option
Prime Super will remove the SRI Balanced option from its investments lineup, citing its poor performance.
Proposals against ESG, DEI to increase: Proxy advisor
Shareholder engagement is likely to change this year, ISS-Corporate says.
Australians reject net zero targets, polling claims
New polling suggests Australians are still not convinced a move to net zero is in their best interests, much preferring the government focus on affordability and reliability.
Whilst it is very pleasing to read that more and more companies are starting to realise that they have a moral responsibility to improve and report their sustainability performance it is not yet compulsory for publicly listed companies or government owned companies - and it should be.
Beyond the moral and transparency dimensions lies the economic.
According to the Carbon Disclosure Project, companies that implement policies to reduce carbon emissions perform better on the stock market compared with those that do not, a survey suggests.
The improved financial performance of companies with high carbon performance is a clear indicator that it makes good business sense to manage and reduce carbon emissions.
Those companies that are taking action to reduce their impact now believe they can gain a competitive advantage over their rivals.
Thank you for a very informative article. I would like to know though the current status on GRI global uptake by sectors and countries.