Future Super measures environmental impact of portfolioBY RACHEL ALEMBAKIS | FRIDAY, 26 JUN 2020 10:10AMFuture Super has released its second impact report, measuring the fund's environmental impact both in terms of fossil fuel investments avoided and renewable energy that investments have generated. |
Editor's Choice
ASIC observes improvement in climate disclosures
ASIC has observed an increase in the quality, quantity, and consistency of climate-related financial information with the introduction of statutory sustainability reporting requirements.
NRFC names new Net Zero Fund head
The National Reconstruction Fund Corporation (NRFC) has appointed Laren McGregor as head of its Net Zero Fund, where she will oversee the investments aimed at helping emissions-intensive industries decarbonise and domestic manufacturers of low-emissions technologies scale up.
Foresight draws super funds' attention in new investment
Foresight Group has raised $660 million from institutional investors, including super funds, to support rising public transport demand.
ARENA launches $30m startup fund
The Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) has launched a new $30 million funding program to help early-stage technologies from development towards commercialisation.
Further Reading




"According to recent research from Rainmaker Information ... if a superannuation fund member invested in general balanced or growth super fund options they would have been 1.5% better off over the 12-months to end March if they chose ESG balanced or growth options."
Is there a link to the research? Does this apply to Future Super's options or to some general ESG classification of investment components and therefore also to other super funds that offer ethical and sustainable social impact investment?
Hi Professor Davos,
The research is derived from Rainmaker Information, the parent company to this publication. It refers to a general balanced or growth super fund option compared to a general ESG balanced or growth option (not just Future Super).