Editor's Choice
Top ASX200 contributors to biodiversity loss revealed
A latest report by Biodiversity Council found energy, materials, industrials and consumer staples consistently emerged as the highest impact sectors for biodiversity loss.
TNFD, King Charles' A4S launch new guide on nature-related issues
King Charles' Accounting for Sustainability (A4S) and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) have joined forces to release a new guide to help executives make better financial decisions when it comes to nature-related impacts, risks and opportunities.
Traditional frameworks no longer suitable in new world: BDO
Australian organisations operating with a traditional risk management framework should look to rehashing the structure, as they were never designed to handle the growing collage of contemporary risks, according to new BDO research.
Lonsec launches governance tool as scrutiny of investment oversight intensifies
Lonsec has launched a new investment governance solution aimed at helping financial advice licensees, trustees and investment committees strengthen oversight of approved product lists as regulatory scrutiny of investment governance continues to increase.




Imposing a levy on imports that maintains CO@ emissions at local levels MUST include the emissions generated from inbound freight. Then we will some non-sensical product imports.
I imagine it would then kill off the proposal to import potatoes from Canada, for example.
As an employee in the manufacturing sector, I sense that industry is concerned at the downstream cost increases for energy consumption from a tax imposed on producers for CO2 emissions. Our operations in NSW incurred a 30% hike in electricity costs last year.
if a $20 a tonne levy is ever passed through to businesses buying electricity, it will push the cost up another 20%. In marginalising domestic manufacturing, has anyone considered balancing this domestic impost with penalties on energy intensive competitor imports?
Could we not impose an even playing field where importers are required to maintain CO2 emissions at the local level, without going into the territory of protectionism?
I think a lot of the anger being displayed throughout the national electorate is because the impost of a tax implies ONLY that business and consumers will use less fuel & electricity when the cost jumps a further 25%. Where are the pro-active policies for renewables, imports and alternates to balance this community cost?
I understand that electricity userd in NSW will be hit with 42% rises in charges over the next few years due to current infrastructure plans, on top of last year's 30% rise. Now we forsee government layering another 25% based on carbon dioxide emissions.
So the power cost doubles over 3-4 years.
How many businesses in NSW will consequently disappear?
Where is the capacity in substitutes?
Why isn't Paul Howes making a big noise about this?