Editor's Choice
Green moves: Frontier Advisors, OMERS
|Frontier Advisors has appointed former Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) specialist Aneesha Singh as responsible investments consultant, strengthening its advice to asset owners on climate, sustainability and responsible investment.
Australian Ethical drops KPMG as auditor
|Australian Ethical will drop its decade-long auditor KPMG and will soon begin the competitive tender process for a new external auditor from FY28.
Philanthropies join forces on Australia's catalytic capital
|Four Australian philanthropic foundations have united to establish the Catalytic Capital Consortium Australia (C3 Australia), a partnership designed to increase the flow of catalytic capital in Australia.
Instos call for global nature disclosure standard
Fifteen financial institutions have called on global sustainability standard-setters to develop a dedicated nature-related disclosure standard, warning that a fragmented approach could undermine investor comparisons and efforts to address biodiversity loss.
Further Reading




Imposing a levy on imports that maintains CO@ emissions at local levels MUST include the emissions generated from inbound freight. Then we will some non-sensical product imports.
I imagine it would then kill off the proposal to import potatoes from Canada, for example.
As an employee in the manufacturing sector, I sense that industry is concerned at the downstream cost increases for energy consumption from a tax imposed on producers for CO2 emissions. Our operations in NSW incurred a 30% hike in electricity costs last year.
if a $20 a tonne levy is ever passed through to businesses buying electricity, it will push the cost up another 20%. In marginalising domestic manufacturing, has anyone considered balancing this domestic impost with penalties on energy intensive competitor imports?
Could we not impose an even playing field where importers are required to maintain CO2 emissions at the local level, without going into the territory of protectionism?
I think a lot of the anger being displayed throughout the national electorate is because the impost of a tax implies ONLY that business and consumers will use less fuel & electricity when the cost jumps a further 25%. Where are the pro-active policies for renewables, imports and alternates to balance this community cost?
I understand that electricity userd in NSW will be hit with 42% rises in charges over the next few years due to current infrastructure plans, on top of last year's 30% rise. Now we forsee government layering another 25% based on carbon dioxide emissions.
So the power cost doubles over 3-4 years.
How many businesses in NSW will consequently disappear?
Where is the capacity in substitutes?
Why isn't Paul Howes making a big noise about this?