Editor's Choice
Two-strike remuneration rule remains effective: ACSI
The two-strike remuneration rule remains effective and continues to strengthen alignment between pay and performance of the board, the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI) said.
UN-backed investor alliance sets climate targets for private markets
Members of the UN-convened Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance are setting climate targets for their private market investments, bringing private equity, infrastructure, real estate and private debt within the same climate ambition as listed assets.
Non-profit urges Australia to step up ahead of COP31
A global non-profit is urging Australia to commit to concrete steps towards a just and equitable transition away from fossil fuels and accelerate the expansion of renewable energy ahead of this year's United Nations Climate Change Conference or COP31.
Future Group finalises change of trusteeship
Future Group's Stewarda has taken over the trusteeship for its superannuation fund, Smart Future Trust, from Equity Trustees Superannuation Limited (ETSL), effective November 1.
Further Reading




Imposing a levy on imports that maintains CO@ emissions at local levels MUST include the emissions generated from inbound freight. Then we will some non-sensical product imports.
I imagine it would then kill off the proposal to import potatoes from Canada, for example.
As an employee in the manufacturing sector, I sense that industry is concerned at the downstream cost increases for energy consumption from a tax imposed on producers for CO2 emissions. Our operations in NSW incurred a 30% hike in electricity costs last year.
if a $20 a tonne levy is ever passed through to businesses buying electricity, it will push the cost up another 20%. In marginalising domestic manufacturing, has anyone considered balancing this domestic impost with penalties on energy intensive competitor imports?
Could we not impose an even playing field where importers are required to maintain CO2 emissions at the local level, without going into the territory of protectionism?
I think a lot of the anger being displayed throughout the national electorate is because the impost of a tax implies ONLY that business and consumers will use less fuel & electricity when the cost jumps a further 25%. Where are the pro-active policies for renewables, imports and alternates to balance this community cost?
I understand that electricity userd in NSW will be hit with 42% rises in charges over the next few years due to current infrastructure plans, on top of last year's 30% rise. Now we forsee government layering another 25% based on carbon dioxide emissions.
So the power cost doubles over 3-4 years.
How many businesses in NSW will consequently disappear?
Where is the capacity in substitutes?
Why isn't Paul Howes making a big noise about this?